Post by nurnobi85 on Feb 11, 2024 23:16:03 GMT -7
Free conventional Interferon to the entire population, which costs around 30 times less than Pegylated Interferon. The question remains: does the Brazilian Constitution guarantee every Brazilian a universal social right to health? If so, a Brazilian citizen can seek all the medicine he needs or all the medical treatment he needs from his judicial system, regardless of the cost involved. This is the majority position in the Brazilian Judiciary. I have focused my research, at the post-doctoral level, on a specific point, that is, on the way in which judicial decisions interfere in the management of resources allocated to public health.
From my daily routine as a federal judge in Brazil, I found that there is a very high (and growing) number of judicial decisions in my country, which will determine the way in which public budgets already approved by Congress will be executed. The Federal Supreme Court, in recent decisions, generally by Dubai Email List Minister Celso de Mello, a notable Brazilian jurist, has determined that the Brazilian State assumes the duty of providing the best medicine available to Brazilian citizens, regardless of the cost involved. From the point of view of a professional linked to Constitutional Law, some apparently simple questions arise, but are difficult to resolve. For example, the fact that in the Brazilian.
system, public budgets are approved by Congress in the year prior to their execution. Congressmen, in a model of representative democracy, are elected directly by the population. In Brazil, direct elections that define the members of the National Congress take place every four years. In this way, public budgets and the way in which the Brazilian State will invest resources obtained through tax collection are part of a broad deliberative process, preceded by general elections. It is said, therefore, that public budgets in Brazil have "popular legitimacy". I say all this because this debate taking place today involves professionals from different segments of society.
From my daily routine as a federal judge in Brazil, I found that there is a very high (and growing) number of judicial decisions in my country, which will determine the way in which public budgets already approved by Congress will be executed. The Federal Supreme Court, in recent decisions, generally by Dubai Email List Minister Celso de Mello, a notable Brazilian jurist, has determined that the Brazilian State assumes the duty of providing the best medicine available to Brazilian citizens, regardless of the cost involved. From the point of view of a professional linked to Constitutional Law, some apparently simple questions arise, but are difficult to resolve. For example, the fact that in the Brazilian.
system, public budgets are approved by Congress in the year prior to their execution. Congressmen, in a model of representative democracy, are elected directly by the population. In Brazil, direct elections that define the members of the National Congress take place every four years. In this way, public budgets and the way in which the Brazilian State will invest resources obtained through tax collection are part of a broad deliberative process, preceded by general elections. It is said, therefore, that public budgets in Brazil have "popular legitimacy". I say all this because this debate taking place today involves professionals from different segments of society.